Skriv ut

Biomarkers (hENT1)


Nucleoside analogue drugs depend on nucleoside transporters to enter the cells where they exert their effect (Fig. 1). Cytarabine and gemcitabine are two anticancer LVT Basalelementer - fig 1drugs that depend on human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (hENT1) for their effect.
This has important practical consequences as a considerable proportion of cancer cells have low expression of hENT1 (Fig. 2). Low clinical effect of treatment has been correlated with reduced or no presence of hENT1 in the cancer cells. This has been confirmed in clinical trials 1,2,3.

Clavis Pharma's LVT drugs, elacytarabine and CP-4126, are derivatives of cytarabine and gemcitabine respectively. In contrast to the established nucleoside drugs, the LVT compounds are able to enter the cells (Fig.3) and therefore  retain their effect independent of the hENT1 expression level4,5. The uptake in hENT1 deficient cells have been confirmed also in vitro with confirmed high formation of the active triphosphate metabolite of elacytarabine nucleosider
            - fig 2and CP-4126 in deficient cancer cells6.

Once inside the cell the lipid tail of the LVT drug is cleaved off and the parent drug is released. With the lack of hENT1 transporter the drug is trapped inside the cell (Fig.3) and high concentrations of active metabolites have been measured .
The above mentioned observations indicate that elacytarabine and CP-4126 may be active in tumours that are resistant to cytarabine and gemcitabine due to the lack of hENT1. This could be important for patients with a poor response to treatment in both AML patients and pancreatic cancer patients.LVT greenhouse - Fig 3

Clavis Pharma is in the process of implementing hENT1 level measurements in tumours from patients in its clinical development programme. The data will both give information on the prevalence of hENT1 expression in the relevant tumours, and also open for the selection of patients for treatment, based on the hENT1 expression level, thus selecting the patients with the extra chance of clinical benefit.
The methods will be validated in accordance with required standards.

 From a patient perspective, this approach is in line with current trends toward more personalised treatment. 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. C.M. Galmarini, X. Thomas, F. Calvo, P. Rousselot, A. El Jafaari, E. Cros, C. Dumontet, Potential mechanisms of resistance to cytarabine in AML patients, Leuk Res 26 (2002) 621-629.
  2. J.J. Farrell, H. Elsaleh, M. Garcia, R. Lai, A. Ammar, W.F. Regine, R. Abrams, A.B. Benson, J. Macdonald, C.E. Cass, A.F. Dicker, J.R. Mackey, Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 Levels Predict Response to Gemcitabine in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer, Gastroenterology 136 (2009) 187-195.
  3. E. Giovannetti, M. Del Tacca, V. Mey, N. Funel, S. Nannizzi, S. Ricci, C. Orlandini, U. Boggi, D. Campani, M. Del Chiaro, M. Iannopollo, G. Bevilacqua, F. Mosca, R. Danesi, Transcription analysis of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 predicts survival in pancreas cancer patients treated with gemcitabine, Cancer Res 66 (2006) 3928-3935.
  4. K. Breistol, J. Balzarini, M.L. Sandvold, F. Myhren, M. Martinsen, E. De Clercq, O. Fodstad, Antitumor activity of P-4055 (elaidic acid-cytarabine) compared to cytarabine in metastatic and s.c. human tumor xenograft models, Cancer Res 59 (1999) 2944-2949.
  5. C.M. Galmarini, F. Myhren, M.L. Sandvold, CP-4055 and CP-4126 are active in ara-C and gemcitabine-resistant lymphoma cell lines, Br J Haematol 144 (2009) 273-275.
  6. A. Adema, Smid,K., Losekoot, N., Myhren, F., Sandvold, M.L., Peters, G.J., Fatty acid derivatives of cytarabine and gemcitabine, CP-4055 and CP-4126, show a prolonged cellular retention compared to the parent drug. , Proceedings of the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. Abstract nr 5740 (2008).